What Teacher Activism Can Do

This compelling portrait describes teachers, not administrators, not state or federal regulators, taking charge of the conditions of their work and building scaffolds to change it.  

Powerful, instructive, important.





4100 Students Prove ‘Small Is Better’ Rule Wrong
By SAM DILLON

BROCKTON, Mass. — A decade ago, Brockton High School was a case study in failure. Teachers and administrators often voiced the unofficial school motto in hallway chitchat: students have a right to fail if they want. And many of them did — only a quarter of the students passed statewide exams. One in three dropped out.

Then Susan Szachowicz and a handful of fellow teachers decided to take action. They persuaded administrators to let them organize a schoolwide campaign that involved reading and writing lessons into every class in all subjects, including gym.

Their efforts paid off quickly. In 2001 testing, more students passed the state tests after failing the year before than at any other school in Massachusetts. The gains continued. This year and last, Brockton outperformed 90 percent of Massachusetts high schools. And its turnaround is getting new attention in a report, “How High Schools Become Exemplary,” published last month by Ronald F. Ferguson, an economist at Harvard who researches the minority achievement gap.

What makes Brockton High’s story surprising is that, with 4,100 students, it is an exception to what has become received wisdom in many educational circles — that small is almost always better.

That is why the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation spent hundreds of millions of dollars in the last decade breaking down big schools into small academies (it has since switched strategies, focusing more on instruction).

The small-is-better orthodoxy remains powerful. A new movie, “Waiting for Superman,” for example, portrays five charter schools in New York, Los Angeles and elsewhere — most with only a few hundred students — as the way forward for American schooling.

Brockton, by contrast, is the largest public school in Massachusetts, and one of the largest in the nation.

At education conferences, Dr. Szachowicz — who became Brockton’s principal in 2004 — still gets approached by small-school advocates who tell her they are skeptical that a 4,100-student school could offer a decent education.

“I tell them we’re a big school that works,“ said Dr. Szachowicz, whose booming voice makes her seem taller than 5-foot-6 as she walks the hallways, greeting students, walkie-talkie in hand.

She and other teachers took action in part because academic catastrophe seemed to be looming, Dr. Szachowicz and several of her colleagues said in interviews here. Massachusetts had instituted a new high school exit exam in 1993, and passing it would be required to graduate a decade later. Unless the school’s culture improved, some 750 seniors would be denied a diploma each year, starting in 2003.

Dr. Szachowicz and Paul Laurino, then the head of the English department — he has since retired — began meeting on Saturdays with any colleagues they could pull together to brainstorm strategies for improving the school.

Shame was an early motivator, especially after the release of the 1999 test scores.

“They were horrible,” Dr. Szachowicz recalled. She painted them in bold letters on poster paper in the group’s Saturday meeting room.

“Is this the best we can be?” she wrote underneath.

The group eventually became known as the school restructuring committee, and the administration did not stand in the way. The principal “just let it happen,” the Harvard report says.

The committee’s first big step was to go back to basics, and deem that reading, writing, speaking and reasoning were the most important skills to teach. They set out to recruit every educator in the building — not just English, but math, science, even guidance counselors — to teach those skills to students.

The committee put together a rubric to help teachers understand what good writing looks like, and began devoting faculty meetings to teaching department heads how to use it. The school’s 300 teachers were then trained in small groups.

Writing exercises took many forms, but encouraged students to think methodically. A science teacher, for example, had her students write out, step by step, how to make a sandwich, starting with opening the cupboard to fetch the peanut butter, through washing the knife once the sandwich was made. Other writing exercises, of course, were much more sophisticated.

Some teachers dragged their feet. Michael Thomas, now the district’s operations director but who led the school’s physical education department at the time, recalled that several of his teachers told him, “This is gym; we shouldn’t have to teach writing.” Mr. Thomas said he replied, “If you want to work at Brockton High, it’s your job.”

Fear held some teachers back — fear of wasting time on what could be just another faddish reform, fear of a heavier workload — and committee members tried to help them surmount it.

“Let me help you,” was a response committee members said they often offered to reluctant colleagues who argued that some requests were too difficult.

The first big boost came with the results of the spring 2001 tests. Although Brockton’s scores were still unacceptably low, they had risen sharply. The state education commissioner, David P. Driscoll, traveled to Brockton to congratulate the school’s cheering students and faculty.

“It had become dogma that smaller was better, but there was no evidence,” said Mr. Driscoll, who since 2007 has headed the National Assessment Governing Board, which oversees federal testing. “In schools, no matter the size — and Brockton is one of the biggest — what matters is uniting people behind a common purpose, setting high expectations, and sticking with it.”

After that early triumph, remaining resistance among the faculty gave way, Dr. Szachowicz said. Overnight, the restructuring committee gained enormous credibility, and scores of once-reluctant teachers wanted to start attending its Saturday meetings, which continue today.

Brockton never fired large numbers of teachers, in contrast with current federal policy, which encourages failing schools to consider replacing at least half of all teachers to reinvigorate instruction.

But Dr. Szachowicz and her colleagues did make some teachers uncomfortable, and at least one teacher who refused to participate in the turnaround was eventually dismissed after due process hearings.

Teachers unions have resisted turnaround efforts at many schools. But at Brockton, the union never became a serious adversary, in part because most committee members were unionized teachers, and the committee scrupulously honored the union contract.

An example: the contract set aside two hours per month for teacher meetings, previously used to discuss mundane school business. The committee began dedicating those to teacher training, and made sure they never lasted a minute beyond the time allotted.

“Dr. Szachowicz takes the contract seriously, and we’ve worked together within its parameters,” said Tim Sullivan, who was president of the local teachers union through much of the last decade.

The committee changed many rules and policies.

The school had an elaborate tracking system, for instance, that channeled students into one of five academic paths. It was largely eliminated because the “basic” courses set low expectations for poor-performing students.

The committee worked to boost the aspirations of students, 69 percent of whom qualify for free lunches because of their families’ low incomes. Teachers were urged to make sure students heard the phrase, “When you go to college …” in every class, every day.

When the school began receiving academic awards, they were made into banners and displayed prominently.

Athletics had traditionally been valued above academic success, and coaches had routinely pressured teachers to raise the grades of star players to maintain their eligibility. Dr. Szachowicz said she put an end to any exceptions.

But the school retained all varsity sports, as well as its several bands and choruses, extensive drama program and scores of student clubs.

Many students consider the school’s size — as big as many small colleges — and its diverse student body (mostly minority), to be points in its favor, rather than problems.

“You meet a new person every day,” said Johanne Alexandre, a senior whose mother is Haitian. “Somebody with a new story, a new culture. I have Pakistani friends, Brazilians, Haitians, Asians, Cape Verdeans. There are Africans, Guatemalans.”

“There’s a couple of Americans, too!” Tercia Mota, a senior born in Brazil, offered. “But there aren’t cliques. Take a look at the lunch table.”

“You can’t say, those are the jocks, those are the preppy cheerleaders, those are the geeks,” Ms. Mota said. “Everything is blended, everybody’s friends with everyone.”

Over the years, Brockton has refined its literacy curriculum. Bob Perkins, the math department chairman, used a writing lesson last week in his Introduction to Algebra II class. He wrote “3 + 72 – 6 x 3 – 11” on the board, then asked students to solve the problem in their workbooks and to explain their reasoning, step by step, in simple sentences.

“I did the exponents first and squared the 7,” wrote Sharon Peterson, a junior. “I multiplied 6 x 3. I added 3 + 49, and combined 18 and 11, because they were both negatives. I ended up with 52-29. The final answer was 23.”

Some students had more trouble, and the lesson seemed to drag a bit.

“This is taking longer than I expected, but it’s not wasted time,” Mr. Perkins said. “They’re learning math, but they’re also learning to write.”

Brockton’s performance is not as stellar in math as in English language arts, and the committee has hired an outside consultant to help develop strategies for improving math instruction, Mr. Perkins said.

Dr. Ferguson said Brockton High first “jumped out of the data” for him early last year. He was examining Massachusetts’ 2008 test scores in his office in Cambridge, and noticed that Brockton had done a better job than 90 percent of the state’s 350 high schools helping its students to improve their language arts scores.

Since then, he has visited Brockton intermittently and invited some of its faculty to the Harvard campus for interviews. The report he wrote with four other Harvard researchers includes an analysis of exemplary performance not only at Brockton, but also at 14 other schools in five states.

The report noted one characteristic shared by all: “Achievement rose when leadership teams focused thoughtfully and relentlessly on improving the quality of instruction.”

Brockton was by far the largest, but only five of the exemplary schools had fewer than 1,000 students, while six had more than 1,700 and two in Illinois had more than 3,000.

“I never bought into the dogma that a huge school can’t be great,” Dr. Ferguson said.

September 27, 2010

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/09/28/education/28school.html?_r=1&pagewanted=all

Advertisements

3 thoughts on “What Teacher Activism Can Do

  1. Not sure I agree with this article central point…. that small is not better. I think they miss the point of Human Scale schools. It was never the size only that true reformers wanted for high schools, but instead the relationships and community that comes with smaller communities. I have not read this fully, but the main problem is that the idea that it is only size that effects learning. Traditional education can be made to look like success at any size, the right kind of education need to center around a the idea that people matter. If you can make people truly matter at 3000 good for you. I don’t think it can be done with out break down the larger community into smaller 150-300 student pods.

    or at least that what my studies have shown 🙂

    • David, I’m with you and have thought about this a lot. That existing in an institution that is 3-4000+ people, for something as intimate and emotionally charged as learning, is inherently dehumanizing.

      The thing that the evidence suggests though, from the Gates experiment with small schools, is that just making them small didn’t mean that all the other problems, with bad instruction, school disengagement and depersonalization went away. It wasn’t the silver bullet folks had hoped for.

      A small school does not necessarily mean a good school. It’s the quality of teaching and learning in the school, and by extension, how adults and children think about each other.

      The cool thing about this Brockton example is that in face of all the odds, and there were significant, huge barriers to real change here, they managed to overcome them. And it was all led, designed, enacted by the teachers in the school. That inspires me.

  2. While it is powerful that the teachers empowered themselves to change the culture of the school, I don’t agree with the main idea of this article. Which is summed up in the last line of the article ” I never bought into the dogma that a huge school can’t be great,” Dr. Ferguson said. ”

    What is not explored in this piece at all is what might be achieve beyond test scores if the same effort was broken down to small groups. How much more deeply might they have helped the students if they had even 4 schools of 1000 student where teachers are not working with 300-500 student every year for 4 years. How many of those students have a mentor in the school, how many have a personal relationship they can draw from, a place in the school that is not on one of the 4 tracks.

    All the instruction ideas they present have been around for ages. Donald Graves died yesterday and he had been talking about using writing in all subjects since at least the 70’s or 80’s…. so great it took a school failing before it could figure out that traditional school are not design to help student learn holistically.

    I am sorry Kirsten, I am getting tired of the idea that academics is the only form of success we should measure.

    Personally I think it hurts the overall cause if we promote stories that claim success this narrowly. What happens when districts start closing smaller schools to create bigger and bigger schools and use articles like this to claim a precedent.

    I agree that size is merely the first step and I believe had Bill Gates continue his study he would find that too. After reading a good amount of literature on the small school movement, I can say that not one of the real champions of the small school movement would claim that smallness was the idea. It is what smallness offers that largeness can not, a sense of relationship, empowerment, flexibility, trust, care, autonomy, and the idea of quality over quantity, excellence (in a Ron Berger sense) over test scores and above all the idea of that schools should be design as if the person mattered. I downfall of the small scale movement is the same of all education movements from the start including the common schools and the progressive movement of Dewey, People come from outside and latch on to a idea that is “Hot” and top-down apply it without truly understanding the why and how behind it. Bill Gates thought I can just makes schools smaller and then behold everything else will be better, lets disregard all the outside and systematic problems that effect students learning , because all that matters is test scores anyway not the actual students or teachers involved or communities. Had he truly listen to is reports we would of notice that it was not merely size but also the way size help teachers change the culture and pedagogy to better suit learning. This is just going to happen again with his new research, because he and a lot of the SUPERMAN REFORMERs are just looking for a quick fix, life is not a informal, it is messy and unique and complex! We can not fix it from a top down matter…….

    Success is good, being able to write and read is a skill needed above all, but what are they limiting by teaching in a mechanical way, what at are they teaching the student” when you “meet a new person everyday ” in your own school….

    As you see this has stuck a cord with me….. It just rubs me the wrong way.
    Again NYTimes shows it is good at headline based articles that are written to create buzz not deep thought!

    Thanks for engaging me….Lets keep it up!

    David

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s